LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: a stated preference study.

Autor/inn/en	Abrizah, A.; Noorhidawati, A.; Zainab, A. N.
Titel	LIS journals categorization in the Journal Citation Report: a stated preference study.
Quelle	In: Scientometrics, (2014) 2, S.1083-1099 PDF als Volltext Verfügbarkeit
Dokumenttyp	gedruckt; online; Zeitschriftenaufsatz
ISSN	0138-9130
DOI	10.1007/s11192-014-1492-3
Schlagwörter	Library and Information Science journals; Journal studies; Journal subject categorizations; Stated preference studies; Journal Citation Report (JCR)
Abstract	Abstract This stated preference study approached the issue on sub-categorization of the information science–library science (IS–LS) journals listed in the Journal Citation Report (JCR) 2011. To investigate this, 243 active authors/editors publishing in this field were requested to indicate their preferred category to 83 journal titles listed in JCR 2011 from four options: information science (IS), library science (LS), information systems (ISys) and do not know/undecided. Based on the popularity count, respondents assigned 39 titles to LS, 23 titles to IS and 21 titles to ISys. Twenty-five titles received high “do-not-know” counts—these are titles in non-English languages, information management and publishing sub-fields. Only one title in LS was grouped in the highest quartile by impact factor, compared to 8 titles in IS and 11 in ISys. This indicates that LS journals are hardly represented among the top 25 % of the impact factor distribution of JCR’s ranked IS–LS journals. Respondents show concern about the “fit” of information systems journals in the IS–LS category.
Erfasst von	OLC
Update	2023/2/05